The fabricator’s proposal to use a glued, laminated design was not based on a fitness for purpose rationale and did not recognise the operational dropped object hazard during their QC control process.The specification of the hardwood cradle block was not adequately detailed in the engineering design, resulting in oversight during company acceptance, oversight during 3rd party verification, and undue latitude in the chosen method of fabrication. The design of the timber cradle block in the new boom rest (glued, laminated timber without lateral mechanical restraint) did not offer adequate physical integrity to withstand repetitive, dynamic loads associated with normal crane usage.There was no work being conducted in the area at the time of the incident. The walkway area where the wood piece landed was not barriered off, although a scaffold was blocking the south end, thereby reducing traffic in the area. The dropped object landed just beside the walkway, and separated into two pieces upon hitting the grating (1.25Kg & 0.55Kg). The rest had been in position for 4 months, and in use for 10 weeks. The crane boom rest was a new installation, designed to accommodate the extended walkway of the new crane boom. Whilst carrying out area checks, the Deck Lead identified that a piece of wood from the crane boom rest had fallen 8.5 meters to the level 5 deck. Dropped Object from Crane Boom Rest Description of Incident
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |